Language and Dictrionaries Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Language and Dictrionaries - Essay ExampleIn his proposal for the new undertaking in lexicography, Richard Chenevix Trench made a overreaching statement by announcing that it is non the function of a dictionary to provide standards (5). Trench described the role of a lexicographer as one of an historian of it language, not a critic (5), whose task is to collect and arrange tout ensemble the words, whether good or bad, and to make his inventory complete (6).James A.H. Murray (not the first off editor, but who is unremarkably associated with the beginning of the dictionary) further expounded on the ideas proposed by Trench. Murray explicated that the role of a lexicographer, as a historian, is not simply to record wordsbut to furnish a biography of each word, giving as nearly as possible the date of its birth or first known appearance, and, in the case of an rare word or sense, or its last appearance, the source from which it was actually derived, the class and sense with which it entered the language or is first found in it, and the successive changes of form and developments of sense which it has since undergone. (47)However, the original OED was not able to achieve the truly descriptive model of lexicographical creation. Indeed, as adamant as Trench was on including all the words, whether good or bad (6), he conceded that A Dictionary ought to know its own limits (56). Trench especially protested against the drafting into the Dictionary a whole legions of purely technical words (57). Interestingly, these words he did not consider as words but as mere signs (57). Another stratum of language that was originally banned from the OED was obscene terminology. Indeed, Bryson contends that much of the obscene vocabulary did not appear in the OED until after 1972 (222).Unlike Johnsons and Websters dictionaries, the OED was no longer a exertion of a single person but the combined action of many (Trench, qtd. in Landau 79). To reflect the fluidity of the langua ge and the mutability of the society, the OED editors continued making adjustments and additions to the dictionary. The first supplementary volume came out in 1933 - five years after the OED was published. In the OED2 preface, the editors recount that most of the additions for the Supplement and for the second edition of the OED concentrated on including more scientific vocabulary, slang, and words from different varieties of English. 1.1 usher in and Front Matter While often overlooked by users, most dictionaries boast a Preface/Front Matter. The aforementioned is often highly informative and as far as the lexicographer is concerned, an invaluable usher to the dictionary and, possibly, previous editions. As one turns to the eighth edition of the Concise Oxford Dictionary, one finds that the above stated holds true. Taken together, both the Preface and Front Matter provide a concise and precise guide to the edition and a guide to its distinctive features. The Preface explains the v ariations between the 8th and previous editions of the dictionary, outlining the changes made to the structure and layout. The breadth of these changes, as listed in the below, are a testament to the extent to which the editions editors, sub-editors and collaborators determined to reflect the times and ensure that the Concise Oxford