Who Fired First Lexington and Concord

Who Fired First? I think with tout ensemble of the visible that I claim just read that I do indeed believe that the British were the first one and only(a)s to clear at Lexington and Concord. I think that because at Lexington the rebels were told not to admit and to sports fan out and stay quiet. So anyone that would have disobeyed that commit would have been severely punished. I feel that because the British were so well(p) trained they did everything that they could to stay out of trouble. In doing this they probably told their overloo poove officer that the rebels blast first. So the soldier that reported the affair to the air force officer did as much as he could to conceal who actu on the wholey fired the first shot. They alike tried to cover it up in their letters to the king reporting what happened. I as well feel that the British soldiers were told to do whatever was necessary to closedown the rebel resistance. They went demoniacal trying to stop the rebe ls as accounted for in one of the officers of the British army letter to the king.

I also think that the rebels wouldnt have shot first because they didnt have an good in number so they use stealth and concealment to win the war. Also in all of the accounts the British were the one to blame. No one fired until the British commander say to shoot. Even though some of the British accounts were first go by experiences they were a little hard to believe. With all of this evidence I have come to believe that the British were at daub and they were the ones who fired first at Lexington and Concord. Because of the wish of evidence to register otherwise it was indeed the British who fir! ed first.If you want to mature a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay