positive presidential campaigning

Should presidential candidates stick to positive campaigning and discuss issues or engage in negative campaigning and smear all(prenominal) a nonher(prenominal)? The semi semipolitical gentleman now and days has fetch very corrupted. preferably of trying to highlight where each presidential candidate stands on issues that atomic number 18 happening now, people argon waying on things in the past. I believe no iodine is perfect and candidates are no different than invariable people. The political world needs to put emphasis on the issues that not only the United States is facing but that the hale world is facing as well. Todays media porees on negatives. We postulate about tragedies in the news, read about the livestock securities industry crashing, but seldom do we hear about where a candidates stands on a certain issue. Unless a mortal has soundly researched a candidate, the people will only hear and shape biased opinions on them. It seems like every other com mercial-grade on TV is either one obstetrical spoken communication down Obama paid by McCain or one charter down McCain paid by Obama.

If people dont hear the positives of candidates and only the negatives then they will be concord to choose the candidate that is the lesser of two evils. The peoples vote shouldnt be for the person who they dislike least, it should be for the candidate that they strongly support and that they think is going to do a great job running our country. The media, such as the news on TV and newspapers and even online newspapers, should really focus on giving unbiased reports and shift their focus from the neg atives of the candidates to the positives of! their campaigns.If you indispensable to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay